JavaScript must be enabled in order for you to use the Site in standard view. However, it seems JavaScript is either disabled or not supported by your browser. To use standard view, enable JavaScript by changing your browser options.

  • Bibliography
| Last Updated: :01/11/2024

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Title : HIGH ENERGY ROCKFALL BARRIERS: A DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS
Subject : Rock Mechanics
Volume No. : xxx
Issue No. : 
Author : A. Grimod, G. Giacchetti
Printed Year : 2013
No of Pages  : 12
Description : 

The European Guideline ETAG 027 - 2008 (“Guideline for European Technical Approval of Falling Rock Protection Kits”) defines the procedures to test rock fall barriers. Nowadays, this guideline is essentially the only test and construction framework utilized by manufacturers and it is also starting to enter in the mentality of designer who can clearly specify the performances of rockfall barriers. ETAG 27 (and the related European Technical Approval and the CE marking) represents a milestone for the rockfall barrier market, because it gives the possibility to compare the performances of different fences and it ensures the quality of the certified product. For these reasons ETAG 27 presently constitutes the base for tenders all around the world. Although rockfall barriers are in common use, designers and consultants do not have a clear overview of the real performances and the technological limits of these structures. The first problem can be solved using ETAG 27 criteria, which allow designing rockfall barriers at ultimate and serviceability limit state. Even though ETAG 27 uses crash tests performed with the Service Energy Level (SEL) and Maximum Energy Level (MEL), design with these concepts is not obvious or in common acceptance. Some preliminary questions must be solved. When can these energy levels be correctly applied? In the case of rockfall simulations, what probabilistic approach must be used for the evaluation of the barrier? Unfortunately ETAG 27 does not give any information or tests relating to the technological limits of the fences. Therefore some important questions arise. How do the site specific aspects of installation affect the barrier performance? What is the behaviour of the barriers under extreme conditions? And finally, the main question lies in the background: what is the functional reliability of ETAG 27? All of the above questions require comprehensive answers, which is consistent with the experience of designers, installers and producers. Officine Maccaferri S.p.A., with its 130 year experience in the field of rockfall protection, collected a large number of case histories with barriers impacted by single or multiple blocks, debris flows, and snow avalanches. Throughout these case histories and in accordance with a recent Italian standard code, it has been possible to implement a reasonable design approach that considers the efficiency of the barrier, the uncertainties of the input data, and the foreseen use of the barrier. This paper presents the calculation approach and outlines some case histories.

 

 

Read The Complete Paper: CLICK HERE